论文部分内容阅读
中学语文课本中的文言文,很多是经过时间考验的传统篇目,注释曾经过了千锤百炼;一些新选入的课文,编者在注释时也尽量吸收了学术界现有的科研成果,颇费了一番苦心。因此就总体而言,课本的注释做到了准确、简明、稳妥,科学性和通俗性结合得很好。但是,由于参加编辑者众多,成书时间不一,偶有疏漏,在所难免。指出不足之处,就一些疑难问题展开讨论,以期课本日趋完善,是广大语文工作者共同的义务。正是本着这一想法,笔者不揣谫陋,对新编高中双册课文中的文言文的若干注释提出自己的看法,供编者和同行参考。
Many of the classical Chinese texts in the Chinese textbooks of middle school are time-tested, traditional articles whose notes have been thoroughly tempered. Some newly selected texts, as well as the editors, try their best to absorb the existing scientific achievements in the academic field during the annotation, Painstakingly Therefore, on the whole, the notes of the textbook are accurate, concise and secure, and the combination of science and popularity is very good. However, due to the large number of editors participating, into different time books, occasional omissions, inevitable. Pointing out the inadequacies, and discussing some difficult problems in order that the textbooks will become more and more perfect. This is a common obligation of the majority of Chinese language workers. It is in this idea, the author does not hides humble, on the new senior high school double text in classical Chinese comments put forward their own views for editors and peers reference.