论文部分内容阅读
进入80年代以后,美国越来越把知识产权的国际保护问题纳入了其外贸整体政策,使得知识产权的保护问题超出了本来的含义。在美国与他国的经贸谈判中,知识产权常常成为一张王牌;同时在美国与他国的知识产权谈判中,贸易报复也成了动辄可用的“杀手锏”。美国越来越频繁地凭借所谓的贸易法“三○一”条款,对他国的知识产权保护提出各种要求,甚至对他国的国内知识产权立法发号施令。美国的这种做法,矛头所向主要是第三世界的发展中国家(地区)和新兴工业国家(地区)。因此,研究美国国际知识产权政策的这种动向以及相应的对策,已成为发展中国家处理知识产权事务时不可回避的课题。
Since the 1980s, the United States has increasingly included the issue of the international protection of intellectual property in its overall foreign trade policy, making the protection of intellectual property beyond its original meaning. In the economic and trade negotiations between the United States and other countries, intellectual property often becomes a trump card. In the meantime, trade retaliation has become a readily available “killer” in the negotiations on intellectual property rights between the United States and other countries. More and more, the United States has made various demands on the intellectual property protection of other countries through the so-called “March 1” clause of the so-called trade law, even giving orders to other countries’ domestic intellectual property legislation. This approach in the United States has been spearheaded mainly to developing countries (regions) and emerging industrial countries (and regions) in the Third World. Therefore, to study this trend of U.S. international intellectual property policy and corresponding countermeasures has become an unavoidable issue for developing countries in dealing with intellectual property issues.