论文部分内容阅读
梅洛-庞蒂在《知觉现象学》最后一章“自由”当中,通过批判萨特的自由观,彰显了他的“处境(situation)中的自由”思想。梅洛-庞蒂对萨特的批评引起波伏娃的反驳,她指出,萨特的《存在与虚无》不乏对人为性和处境的论述,而梅洛-庞蒂在批评萨特时并没有提到这一点。~([1])由此看来,梅洛-庞蒂对萨特的批评是有失公允的。但是,当我们将问题追溯到本体论和时间性的领域时,却发现问题没有这么简单。一梅洛-庞蒂对萨特自由思想的批评
In his last chapter, “Freedom,” “Phenomenology of Perception,” Merleau-Ponty highlighted his “free” mentality in the situation by criticizing Sartre’s concept of freedom. Melo-Ponty’s criticism of Sartre provoked Beauvoir’s refutation. She pointed out that Sartre’s “existence and nothingness” there is no lack of discussion on the human and the situation, and Melo - Ponty did not criticize Sartre Mention this. ~ ([1]) From this point of view, Melo - Ponty’s criticism of Sartre is unfair. However, when we trace the issue back to the ontological and temporal aspects, we find the problem is not so simple. A Melo - Ponty ’s Criticism of Sartre’ s Free Thought