论文部分内容阅读
案情简介: 1994年1月14日,工程师王某与建材厂签订了一份《关于“玻璃浴盆生产技术转让”的中介合同》,约定由王某负责中间介绍,选择适当接产厂家并促使转让成功,建材厂则在与接产厂家签订技术转让合同、收取技术转让费后,即将该转让费的30％作为中介费以现金交付王某。合同签订前后,王某在介绍、推荐玻璃浴盆生产技术的过程中,选择纸箱厂作为接产厂家,并促使建材厂与纸箱厂签订了《技术项目转让协议书》,建材厂在对纸箱厂工人进行了接产培训后,于2月27日收取技术转让费5500元,但未按合同约定给付王某中介费。王某索要未果,遂向法院起诉,要求被告给付居间介绍费1650元并承担因索款而
Brief introduction of the case: January 14, 1994, engineer Wang and building materials factory signed a “contract on the glass tub production technology transfer,” the agreement, agreed by Wang responsible for the middle of the introduction, choose to pick the appropriate manufacturers and to facilitate the transfer Success, the building materials factory and then take over the manufacturer signed a technology transfer contract, after receiving the technology transfer fee, about 30% of the transfer fee will be paid as an intermediary fee in cash Wang. Before and after the signing of the contract, Wang introduced the recommended glass tub production technology in the process, the choice of carton factory as a follow-up manufacturer, and prompted the building materials factory and carton factory signed a “project transfer agreement”, building materials factory in carton factory workers After taking delivery of training, on February 27 to receive technology transfer fee 5500 yuan, but not according to the contract to pay Wang intermediary fees. Wang unsuccessfully, then sued the court, asking the defendant to pay inter-agency fee of 1,650 yuan and assume due to claim