论文部分内容阅读
判决的法律效果,是指法官严格依法对各类案件进行审判,判决于法有据,维护了法律的统一性、确定性和权威性。判决的社会效果,是指法官通过法律适用,使法律规范由应然变为实然,判决结果符合普通民众的心理预期和公平公正的观念,得到社会各界和人民群众的普遍认同。法律效果和社会效果是对立统一的关系。法律的滞后性、抽象性与社会物质生活的变动性、具体性之间的矛盾,是法律效果和社会效果对立的原因。同时,法律效果是社会效果的基础,社会效果是法律效果的目标,二者统一于司法实践。法律解释方法是实现法律效果和社会效果有机统一的有效方法,是架设两者统一的桥梁。此外,注重法律原则的适用也是实现法律效果和社会效果统一的有效方法。
The legal effect of the verdict refers to the judge’s trial of various types of cases in strict accordance with the law, and the verdict is based on law and maintains the unity, certainness and authority of the law. The social effect of the verdict refers to the judge’s approval of the law that legal norms should be turned into reality, and the verdict conforms to the general public’s psychological expectations and fairness and fairness, which has been widely accepted by all walks of life and people. Legal effects and social effects are the unity of opposites. The contradiction between the law lag, the abstraction and the change and the concreteness of the material life of the society is the reason that the legal effect and the social effect oppose each other. At the same time, the legal effect is the basis of the social effect, the social effect is the goal of the legal effect, and the two are united in the judicial practice. The legal interpretation method is an effective way to realize the organic unity of the legal effect and the social effect, and it is to set up a unified bridge between the two. In addition, focusing on the application of the principle of law is also an effective way to unify legal effects and social effects.