论文部分内容阅读
“休屠金人”一事首见于《史记》,《汉书》亦有记载。班、马文字略有差异,但具体内容基本相同。这本是一件小事,但因牵涉到佛教传人时间,遂引起后代学者长期争论。目前,学界虽然对此问题基本达成共议,即休屠金人并非佛像,但仍时有学者从不同角度提出疑问。在没有新的确凿论据出现以前,对此疑问可以暂付阙如,但因休屠金人一
“Hugh Tuzhu people ” was first seen in the “Historical Records”, “Han” also recorded. There are slight differences between classes and horses, but the details are basically the same. This is a trivial matter, but the involvement of Buddhist descendants of time has provoked protracted debates among future generations of scholars. At present, although the academic circles have basically reached a consensus on this issue, that is, there are still statues of Buddhist scholars who are not slaughtering gold but scholars still raise questions from different angles. In the absence of a new conclusive argument before, this question can be temporarily absent, but the rest