论文部分内容阅读
为纪念戊戌变法90周年,由中国史学会、广东史学会等12个单位联合发起并组织的“戊戌变法研究国际学术讨论会”于1988年11月12日至16日在广东省南海县和新会县两地召开。围绕“戊戌维新与中国近代化”这个主题,对中国近代史上这场重大的改革运动及其杰出的领袖人物康有为、梁启超等的改革思想和实践进行了新的评价。一、变法的性质与会代表基本上不再沿用“改良主义”的提法,但在戊戌变法是否属于“资产阶级革命”的问题上,仍然存在分歧,并进一步对改良和革命在历史上的地位及其相互关系重新加以认识,比较一致地感到:判断一个政治运动地位的高低,一个政治主张的优劣,不应以是否使用暴力、是否最为激进作为标准,换言之,也就是不能以是改良还是革命作为标准,而应根据当时当地的历
To commemorate the 90th anniversary of the Reform Movement of 1898, the 18th International Symposium on the Reform of the Reform Movement of 1898 jointly sponsored and organized by 12 units such as the Chinese Historical Society and the Guangdong Society of History was held in Nanhai County, Guangdong Province from November 12 to November 16, 1988. Huixian held in both places. Around the theme of “Reform of 1898 and Modernization of China”, this article made a new evaluation on the reform thoughts and practices of this important reform movement in modern Chinese history and its outstanding leaders Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao. First, the nature of changes in law The delegates are basically no longer follow the “reformism” formulation, but in the reform of 1898 whether belong to the “bourgeois revolution”, there are still differences, and further improvement and revolution in history And their mutual relations, they all feel more consistent: judging the status of a political movement and the pros and cons of a political opinion should not be based on whether violence is the most radical or not. In other words, can we not improve or Revolution as a standard, but should be based on local calendar