论文部分内容阅读
目的观察微管微创人工流产与常规人工流产术的临床效果,为育龄妇女寻找安全有效终止妊娠的方法。方法将120例无禁忌症的育龄妇女随机分为两组,观察组使用一次性宫腔组织吸引管行人工流产,对照组行常规人工流产,比较两组在疼痛、术中出血、手术时间、及术后出血天数上的区别。结果观察组在疼痛、术中出血、手术时间、及术后出血天数等方面均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论微管微创人工流产是更具人性化和符合WHO倡导的预防交叉感染生殖健康理念的人工流产技术。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of microtrauma induced abortion and conventional induced abortion, and to find a safe and effective termination of pregnancy for women of childbearing age. Methods A total of 120 women of childbearing age without contraindication were randomly divided into two groups. The observation group was treated with disposable uterine tissue suction tube abortion, while the control group with conventional abortion. The pain, intraoperative bleeding, operation time, And postoperative bleeding days on the difference. Results The observation group was superior to the control group in pain, intraoperative bleeding, operation time and the number of postoperative bleeding days (P <0.05). Conclusion Microtubation induced abortion is more humane and abortion-induced abortion, which is advocated by WHO to prevent cross-infection of reproductive health.