论文部分内容阅读
行政诉讼起诉人的举证范围不同于行政诉讼原告的举证范围,前者着眼于提起诉讼后到法院受理之前起诉人举证事项的厘定,作为一个很好的角度,以此观察行政诉讼受理难在何处,起诉人欲行行政诉讼会遭遇哪些困难,起诉人的起诉成本和工作量究竟有多大。这是个很有必要讨论的实践问题。本文在廓清起诉人的举证范围的同时,厘定起诉人应提交起诉材料的范围,更为精细、明确地划定起诉人的起诉成本和工作量,以求实实在在地减小行政诉讼的起诉难度。
The scope of the burden of proof of the administrative litigant is different from that of the plaintiff of the administrative litigation. The former looks at the determination of the prosecutor’s evidence before the court takes the lawsuit after it is filed, so as to see where the administrative litigation is difficult , Prosecutors want to go administrative litigation will encounter what difficulties, prosecutors prosecution costs and workload exactly how much. This is a very necessary practical issue to be discussed. This article clarifies the scope of the prosecutor’s evidence, at the same time determine the prosecutor should submit the scope of the prosecution materials, a more detailed and clear delineation of the prosecutor’s prosecution costs and workload in order to truly reduce the administrative proceedings more difficult to prosecute .