论文部分内容阅读
【摘要】清朝末年，中国内忧外患，思想、生产力落后。在中国内忧外患之际，严复翻译了英国生物学家赫胥黎的《天演论》，在《天演论译例言》中，严复提出了“信达雅”的翻译理念，影响深远。“信”指意义不背原文，即是译文要准确，不歪曲，不遗漏，也不要随意增减意思；“达”指不拘泥于原文形式，译文通顺明白；“雅”则指译文时选用的词语要得体，追求文章本身的古雅，简明优雅。笔者将《天演论译例言》描述“信达雅”翻译理念的部分进行了翻译，共同探讨翻译标准与原则。
【关键词】严复 天演论译例言 信达雅
原文：
译事三难：信、达、雅。求其信已大难矣，顾信矣不达，虽译犹不译也，则达尚焉。海通已来，象寄之才，随地多有，而任取一书，责其能与于斯二者则已寡矣。其故在浅尝，一也；偏至，二也；辨之者少，三也。今是书所言，本五十年来西人新得之学，又为作者晩出之书。译文取明深义，故词句之间，时有所颠倒附益，不斤斤于字比句次，而意义则不倍本文。题曰达旨，不云笔译，取便发挥，实非正法。什法师有云：学我者病。来者方多，幸勿以是书为口实也。
译文：
There are three difficult things in the process of translation ，faithfulness， comprehensibility and elegance. Faithfulness is difficultenough， if the translator just pursue faithfulness， they may fail in comprehensibility ，then there translation work is meaningless ，so the comprehensibility is significant .Since we take the policy of opening ，there are plenty of translators， but the qualified
Translators who can combine faithfulness and comprehensibility is not common. There are three reasons for that phenomenon， firstly ，they just have rough skim of the original work ；Secondly ，they don’t have an overall analysis and study about the original work； thirdly ，they can’t comprehend truly. Now ， what this book want to explain is both the western scientific circle ‘s new reach result for 50 years and the scientist ‘s
Work at the old age， my translation focus on the theory quintessence. SoI add and delete some words according to my own understanding ，I even revise and replenish the work. The translation work don’t need to restrain by the origin work ，if only the main point shows no different with the origin work. In another words ，if only the translator can express the origin work’s main point ，they don’t need to follow the origin work ，they can recreate it. But that is not the right way of translation. Just like the well-known monk master Jiumoluoshi said ， blind imitation with ludicrous effection. Afterward， there will be more translator ，please don’t follow my way .
参考文献：
[1] 许健.以“达”为尊，既“信”且“雅”——严复“译例言”及严译《天演论》重读[J].中山大学学报（社会科学版），2013， 53（3）
[2] 陈叶.严复"信、达、雅"新解[J].学术交流，2004.08
[3] 周领顺.新史料求证严复的翻译思想--从发展的角度看"信、达、雅"的包容性和解释力[J].四川外语学院学报，2006， 22（3）.
[4] 娜日苏.复“信、达、雅”的翻译思想及其西学翻译之路[J].兰台世界，2013，（34）
【关键词】严复 天演论译例言 信达雅
原文：
译事三难：信、达、雅。求其信已大难矣，顾信矣不达，虽译犹不译也，则达尚焉。海通已来，象寄之才，随地多有，而任取一书，责其能与于斯二者则已寡矣。其故在浅尝，一也；偏至，二也；辨之者少，三也。今是书所言，本五十年来西人新得之学，又为作者晩出之书。译文取明深义，故词句之间，时有所颠倒附益，不斤斤于字比句次，而意义则不倍本文。题曰达旨，不云笔译，取便发挥，实非正法。什法师有云：学我者病。来者方多，幸勿以是书为口实也。
译文：
There are three difficult things in the process of translation ，faithfulness， comprehensibility and elegance. Faithfulness is difficultenough， if the translator just pursue faithfulness， they may fail in comprehensibility ，then there translation work is meaningless ，so the comprehensibility is significant .Since we take the policy of opening ，there are plenty of translators， but the qualified
Translators who can combine faithfulness and comprehensibility is not common. There are three reasons for that phenomenon， firstly ，they just have rough skim of the original work ；Secondly ，they don’t have an overall analysis and study about the original work； thirdly ，they can’t comprehend truly. Now ， what this book want to explain is both the western scientific circle ‘s new reach result for 50 years and the scientist ‘s
Work at the old age， my translation focus on the theory quintessence. SoI add and delete some words according to my own understanding ，I even revise and replenish the work. The translation work don’t need to restrain by the origin work ，if only the main point shows no different with the origin work. In another words ，if only the translator can express the origin work’s main point ，they don’t need to follow the origin work ，they can recreate it. But that is not the right way of translation. Just like the well-known monk master Jiumoluoshi said ， blind imitation with ludicrous effection. Afterward， there will be more translator ，please don’t follow my way .
参考文献：
[1] 许健.以“达”为尊，既“信”且“雅”——严复“译例言”及严译《天演论》重读[J].中山大学学报（社会科学版），2013， 53（3）
[2] 陈叶.严复"信、达、雅"新解[J].学术交流，2004.08
[3] 周领顺.新史料求证严复的翻译思想--从发展的角度看"信、达、雅"的包容性和解释力[J].四川外语学院学报，2006， 22（3）.
[4] 娜日苏.复“信、达、雅”的翻译思想及其西学翻译之路[J].兰台世界，2013，（34）