论文部分内容阅读
后人对中国古代“小说”概念的理解存在分歧,但多以三条文献为立论根据:一是《庄子·杂篇、外物》中的“饰小说以干县令,其于大达亦远矣。”一是《文选》卷二十一江淹杂体诗《李都尉陵从军》注中载东汉桓谭语“若其小说家,合丛残小语,近取譬论,以作短书,治身理家,有可观之辞。”一是班固在《汉书·艺文志里》“小说家流,盖出于稗官,街头巷语,道听途说之所造也。”对这三段话虽然有仁者见仁,智者见智的理解,但有一点是应该得到共识的,那就是这
There are differences between the descendants’ understanding of the concept of “novel” in ancient China. However, most of them are based on three documents: one is Zhuangzi miscellaneous articles, Carry on. “First,” anthology “Volume twenty-one Jiang Yan hybrid poem” Lidu Wei Ling from the Army, “note contains the Eastern Han Dynasty Huan Tan language” If the novelist, Cong Cong residual small language, Short book, rule the body, there is considerable rhetoric. “First, Ban Gu in the” Han Wen Yi Li Chi “novelist flow, cover out of the barbarian officer, street alley, hearsay said made.” Of these three Although there are people who talk about benevolence, wise men see the understanding, but one thing is that there should be consensus, that is, this