论文部分内容阅读
中国从1953年提出,1954年与印度、缅甸等国共同倡导和平共处五项原则,到1955年参加亚非会议所体现的求同存异的万隆精神,表明中国已经在国际社会彰显一个具有亲和力、领导力的大国形象。和平共处五项原则是中国为国际法走向后殖民时代所做出的重要贡献,并产生了重要的影响。和平共处五项原则是一个带有深刻的“冷战”背景的、开放的理论体系。应当在国际法发展的历史进程中观察,分析其历史积极作用。当今,它已成为中国国际法立场的重要组成方面,是国际法与中国协同进化的一部分。在当今中国发展的语境下,要深入促进中国的软实力、提升中国的国际法形象,应当强调持续稳定和推陈出新之间的平衡,推进理论与实践之间的有机融合,这是总结包括和平共处五项原则在内的历史财产应当明确的态度。然而,在历史的进程中,不难看出,从和平共处到求同存异,新中国成立后30年间外交路线中的重要理念,面临着不同主张和理念的竞争与挑战。基于阶级斗争话语的革命路线在那段时间不仅活跃于内政问题上,也经常在外交领域居于主流地位。在妥协与斗争之间的方向选择,对于中国的利益和目标产生不同的效果。实践证明,强硬的斗争姿态会使我们在国际事务中孤立,失去与各国的交流机会;柔和共存的姿态则能够赢得更多的支持和理解,更有助于实现自身的利益。不同外交立场对于中国大国道路的影响,至今仍然有着鲜明的启示意义。
China proposed in 1953 that the five principles of peaceful coexistence with India and Burma in 1954 and the Bandung spirit of seeking common ground while reserving differences in joining the Asian-African conference in 1955 demonstrated that China has demonstrated in the international community an affinity and leadership Power of the image of the big country. The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence are China’s important contributions to the post-colonial era of international law and have had a significant impact. The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence is an open theoretical system with a profound “Cold War” background. We should observe and analyze its historical positive role in the historical process of the development of international law. Today it has become an important part of China’s position on international law and part of the co-evolution of international law and China. In today’s context of China’s development, it is necessary to further promote China’s soft power and enhance China’s image of international law by emphasizing the balance between sustained stability and innovation, and promoting the organic integration of theory and practice. This is a conclusion that includes peaceful coexistence The five principles, including the historic property should be a clear attitude. However, in the course of history, it is not hard to see that from peaceful coexistence to seeking common ground while putting aside differences, the important idea in the diplomatic line during the 30 years after the founding of new China was faced with the competition and challenges of different opinions and concepts. During that period, the revolutionary line based on the discourse of class struggle was not only active on the issue of internal affairs, but also frequently prevailed in the field of diplomacy. The direction choice between compromise and struggle has different effects on China’s interests and goals. Practice has proved that a hard-line struggle will isolate us in international affairs and lose opportunities for exchanges with other countries. A soft coexistence attitude will win more support and understanding and will help realize our own interests. The impact of different diplomatic positions on the path of the great power in China still has its own significance.