论文部分内容阅读
“凡”、“凡是”的词性,颇多争议,给中学语法教学带来诸多不便。初中《语文》第二册中的语法知识短文中认为“凡是”是副词。(P 264)邢福义(1981)认为“‘凡’常常和‘是’结合成‘凡是’。‘凡是’相当于‘凡’,也是个表统指的数量代词。”黄伯荣、廖序东(1985 P 328下文凡注页码的均见黄著)主编的《现代汉语》(下册)认为:“‘每、各、某、另、别、凡、本、其他、其余’也都是指示代词。”朱德熙(1984)认为:“‘光、就、单、凡’一类副词直接在名词前头出现的句子应该看成是省略了‘是’的紧缩形式。”宋秀令(1979)认为:“凡是……就(都)”是关联词语,同“只有……才”、“无论……都”一样,
“Fan”, “all” part of speech, a lot of controversy, to the grammar teaching in secondary school to bring a lot of inconvenience. Junior high school “language” in the second grammar knowledge of short essays that “is” is an adverb. (P 264) Xing Foyi (1981) argues that “all” often combine with “is” into “all.” “All are equivalent to” van “and are quantitative pronouns of the same epoch.” Huang Borong, Liao Xudong (1985, p 328 The text of “Modern Chinese” (Book 2), edited by the editor, holds the following opinion: “Every one, every, every, every, every, every, every, this, other, and the rest are also demonstrative pronouns.” Zhu De Hee (1984) argues that “sentences appearing immediately before the nouns as adverbs such as ’Guang, Dan, Shan, Fan’ should be treated as a tightening form that omits ’Yes.’” Song Xiuling (1979) states: “All ... (All) ”is a related term, the same as“ only ...... only ”,“ no matter ...... all ”