论文部分内容阅读
1997年7月25日,北京市高级人民法院的一纸判决,送达中国社会科学院语言所、商务印书馆。诉讼达4年之久的涉及王同亿、海南出版社的五起著作权侵权案中的一起,终因判决书上那不容置疑的判决,有了结果。判决书上写着:“一审判决认定事实清楚,处理结果基本正确,上诉人的上诉理由不能成立。根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百五十三条第一款第(一)项,判决如下:驳回上诉,维持原判。”原判的结论,人们记忆犹新。1996年岁末的
On July 25, 1997, a piece of paper verdict of the Beijing Higher People’s Court was served on the language institute and the Commercial Press of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Four years of litigation involving Wang Tongyi, Hainan Publishing House, five cases of copyright infringement, the verdict on the final verdict that no doubt, with the result. The verdict reads: “The first instance verdict clearly that the facts are clear, the results are basically correct, the appellant’s appeal ground can not be established.” According to “Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 153, paragraph 1 (a) , The verdict is as follows: Dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict. " The end of 1996