论文部分内容阅读
回想到南京博物院工作之初,曾编辑过《高二适研究》(一九九七年)与《胡小石研究》(一九九九年),所以没有继续责编后续的《林散之研究》与《萧娴研究》之原因,是当时觉得前者已成热门,凑热闹意义不大,况可担责编亦另有人选;后者则因为有价值的文献资料较少,故内容单薄,难成佳构。事至如今,林散之热得以延续,有关专著专论不断涌现。所以,要完
Recalling the beginning of the work of the Nanjing Museum, he edited Editors’ Research in High School II (1997) and Hu Xiaoshi (1999), so he did not continue to compile the research on Lin San The reason for the study of “Hsiao-han” was that the former thought that the former had become a hot topic and that there was not much point in making fun of it. Moreover, the latter could be responsible for the selection of editors and others. The latter, due to the small amount of valuable literature, . Until now, the heat of Lin San continued, monographs on monuments continue to emerge. So, finish