论文部分内容阅读
因和解内涵的理解差异,刑事和解案件范围在立法、司法与学界存在严重分歧。刑事和解案件范围的确定应当立足于刑事和解内涵的重新厘定以及刑事和解与刑事政策在案件处理方面的差别。当刑事和解建立在当事人双方达成谅解而致起诉权的放弃与加害人刑事可罚性降低的前提下,它只能适用于存在被害人的自诉案件与公诉案件,而且,应当遵循宪法原则、平等原则下的差别原则及公序良俗确定其中的个罪能否和解。
Due to the different understanding of connotation of conciliation, the range of criminal conciliation cases has serious disagreement between legislation, judicature and academia. The scope of the criminal reconciliation case should be based on the redefinition of the connotation of criminal reconciliation and the differences in the handling of criminal reconciliation and criminal policy. When the criminal reconciliation is established on the understanding of both parties that the right to give up the litigation and the perpetrators of criminal penalties to reduce the premise, it can only apply to the existence of victims of private prosecution cases and public prosecution cases, and should follow the constitutional principle, the principle of equality Under the principle of difference and public order and good customs to determine whether one of these crimes can reconcile.