论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨联合用药辅助手动负压吸引术在人工流产(简称人流)中的应用效果。方法选择2012~2013年东海县计划生育指导站自愿要求人流的妊娠8周内未产妇、高龄孕妇、有剖宫产史孕妇100例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各50例。观察组术前2 h阴道放置米索前列醇400μg,术时宫颈旁侧注射2%盐酸利多卡因2 mL,行手动负压吸引术;对照组术前术中均不给予辅助药物,常规行手动负压吸引术。比较两组镇痛效果、宫颈松驰度、术中及术后情况。结果两组术中镇痛效果、宫颈松驰度、人流综合反应、手术时间、手术满意度比较,观察组显著优于对照组(P<0.05);两组术中出血量、不良反应比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论联合用药辅助手动负压吸引术在人流中优于单纯的手动负压吸引术。
Objective To explore the effect of combined medication assisted manual vacuum aspiration in artificial abortion (abbreviated as human flow). Methods One hundred pregnant women, pregnant women with cesarean section and 100 pregnant women with cesarean section were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 50 cases in each group. In the observation group, 400 μg of misoprostol was placed in the vagina 2 h before surgery, and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride was injected into the cervix by hand. The patients in the control group received neither manual nor surgical suction, Manual vacuum aspiration. The analgesic effect, cervical relaxation, intraoperative and postoperative conditions were compared between the two groups. Results The analgesic effect, cervical relaxation rate, comprehensive reaction of human flow, operation time, and surgical satisfaction of the two groups were significantly better than those of the control group (P <0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, adverse reactions, The difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusions The combination of medication-assisted manual vacuum aspiration is superior to simple manual vacuum aspiration in the flow of people.