论文部分内容阅读
1、马克思、恩格斯在个人消费品分配问题上的一大贡献,表现在他们明确地阐述了未来“共产主义第一阶段”个人消费品实行按劳分配的原则。但同时,他们也认为按劳分配本身存在一定的缺点,其缺点就在于,平等的权利.事实上默认了不同劳动能力之间的不平等,赡养家庭人口不同的不平等.因此马克思断言:这仍然是资产阶级法权.形式上平等事实上不平等一定是资产阶级权利吗?这是很值得商榷的.资产阶级权利,就其本来的含义讲,是资本主义生产关系的集中表现。在资本主义生产关系
1. Marx and Engels made a great contribution to the issue of the distribution of personal consumer goods in that they explicitly stated the principle of “distribution according to time” of personal consumption products in the first phase of communism in the future. However, at the same time, they also consider that there are some shortcomings in the distribution according to work. The disadvantage of this is that they have equal rights. In fact, by default, inequalities between different working capacities and different inequalities in the family population are supported. Therefore, Marx asserts that this Is still bourgeois right.Formal equality in fact inequality must be a bourgeois right? This is very debatable .Better class rights, in its original meaning, is the concentrated expression of the capitalist relations of production. In the capitalist relations of production