论文部分内容阅读
以阿马蒂亚.森的权利分析方法作为主要的理论框架,在参考脆弱性分析和社会资产分析的基础上,将外部干预和农户的社会资本加入上述权利分析框架,用以解释农户灾后恢复的差异。研究发现,资源禀赋和交换权利的差异造成了农户灾后恢复的差异:具有较好资源禀赋和交换权利的农户能够迅速跳出短期贫困的陷阱,恢复生计;而资源禀赋和交换权利较差的农户则无法迅速跳出地震灾害所造成的短期贫困陷阱,恢复生计。
Taking Amartya Sen’s rights analysis method as the main theoretical framework, based on the analysis of vulnerability and social assets, external intervention and social capital of farmers are added to the above rights analysis framework to explain the farmers’ post-disaster recovery The difference. The study found that the differences of resource endowments and exchange rights caused the difference of farmers’ recovery after disaster: farmers with better resource endowments and exchange rights could quickly jump out of the trap of short-term poverty and restore their livelihoods; while the resource endowments and farmers with poor exchange rights Unable to quickly jump out of the short-term poverty trap caused by the earthquake and restore livelihood.