论文部分内容阅读
围绕着千手观音造像修复工程,一直存在“新”与“旧”的看法。从上世纪80年代以来,我们主要做的事情就是危岩加固,防渗水、防污、防盗窃、防破坏,对石质文物保护修复一直遵循整旧如旧、保持原貌的原则。我也不例外,之前在工作中接受的理念也是如此。但在后期的具体修复实践中,我发现这种理念有艰难之处。例如:原貌的标准怎么掌握?“如旧”要“旧”到什么程度?大足石刻从诞生到现在,有的1000多年了,晚的也有800年,其中哪个时期的样貌算是其
Around the Avalokitesvara image restoration project, there has always been a “new” and “old” view. Since the 1980s, our main task is to strengthen the dangerous rock, seepage, pollution prevention, anti-theft, anti-sabotage, restoration of the stone cultural relics has always followed the principle of the whole as old, to maintain the original appearance. I’m no exception, as I did with the philosophy I accepted earlier in my work. However, in the latter part of the concrete restoration practice, I found that this concept has its own difficulties. For example: how to grasp the original appearance of the standard? “As the old ” to “old ” To what extent? Dazu rock carved from birth to the present, some 1000 years, late 800 years, which period looks like its