论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究不同腕带(电子扫描码型腕带及手写型传统腕带)对择期手术患儿佩戴的依从性。方法:选取本院择期手术患儿200例作为研究对象,按照入院日期随机分为观察组及对照组各100例。观察组及对照组分别给予患儿佩戴电子扫描码型腕带及手写型传统腕带,对两组患儿腕带佩戴依从性定时进行每天评价(连续评价7d)。结果:连续评价7d后结果显示:对照组患儿未佩戴人次为158人次;观察组患儿未佩戴人次为21人次。两组患儿佩戴腕带的依从性比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:不同腕带(电子扫描码型腕带及手写型传统腕带)对手术患儿佩戴依从性具有显著的差异,电子扫描码型腕带更适宜临床采用,即对临床核对工作方便准确又能很好的对患儿隐私予以保护,更易使患儿及家属接受,因此,佩戴电子扫描码型腕带的依从性较比手写型传统腕带高,而且更适合临床工作,值得推广应用。
OBJECTIVE: To study the compliance of different wristbands (electronic scanning pattern wristbands and handwriting traditional wristbands) on children wearing elective surgery. Methods: A total of 200 children undergoing elective surgery in our hospital were selected as research objects and randomly divided into observation group and control group according to the date of admission. The observation group and the control group were given electronic scanning pattern wristbands and handwritten traditional wristbands, respectively, and the compliance rate of the wristbands of the two groups was evaluated daily (continuous evaluation for 7d). Results: After continuous evaluation for 7 days, the results showed that there were 158 unadopted children in the control group and 21 unadopted children in the observation group. Compliance between the two groups wearing wristbands was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Different wristbands (electronic scanning pattern wristbands and handwriting traditional wristbands) have significant differences in the wearing compliance of children under operation. The electronic scanning pattern wristbands are more suitable for clinical use, that is to say, they are convenient and accurate for clinical checkups Therefore, the compliance of wearing the electronic scanning pattern wristband is higher than the handwriting traditional wristband, and is more suitable for clinical work, which is worth popularizing and applying.