论文部分内容阅读
[目的]综合评价嵊州市城乡生活饮用水的水质,及时提出改进对策与措施,保障当地饮用水安全。[方法]随机抽取2011年41份城乡水厂的监测数据,运用饮用水水质指数(DWQI)法和五色等级分级法对检测结果进行综合评价和分级。[结果]水质优良占29.73%(绿色),良好占21.62%(蓝色),较差占10.81%(黄色),差占35.14%(红色),很差占2.70%(黑色)。市级水厂水质优于乡镇级水厂,乡镇级水厂优于村级水厂。[结论]嵊州市城乡生活饮用水水质不容乐观,有关部门应加强监督与管理,同时,综合指数评价和五色等级分级法能直观反映水质的优劣,便于水质信息公开和公众理解及参与。
[Objective] To comprehensively evaluate the water quality of drinking water in urban and rural areas of Shengzhou City, improve measures and measures in time to ensure the safety of local drinking water. [Method] The monitoring data of 41 urban and rural water plants in 2011 were randomly selected. The drinking water quality index (DWQI) method and the five-color grading method were used to evaluate and classify the test results. [Result] The good water quality accounted for 29.73% (green), good 21.62% (blue), poor 10.81% (yellow), poor 35.14% (red) and badly accounted for 2.70% (black). Municipal water quality is better than township water quality, township water quality better than the village water. [Conclusion] The quality of life drinking water in urban and rural areas of Shengzhou is not optimistic, and relevant departments should strengthen the supervision and management. Meanwhile, the comprehensive index evaluation and the five - color grading method can directly reflect the advantages and disadvantages of water quality and facilitate the publicity and public participation of water quality information.