论文部分内容阅读
给房地产业吃的退烧药似乎已经起了作用,一些地方的房地产市场不同程度地出现了降温,价格上涨趋缓,交投冷清,投机炒作行为得到一定遏制。但面对市场浓厚的观望情绪,房市的沉寂,一些地方领导坐不住了。因为市场交易金额减少,就意味着地方税收的同步减少,直接影响政绩; 鉴于房地产业从开发、建设到消费对银行倚重太深,资金实力不济的开发商一旦不能及时回笼资金,将给银行带来呆、坏账,加大金融风险,也加大了政府投鼠忌器的顾虑。于是乎, 一些地方政府一方面积极回应中央的调控政策,一方面又观望中央、环视周边,伺机出台解释细则。如一些地方以中央是稳定房价而不是打压房价
Antipyretics to the real estate industry seems to have played a role, in some places the real estate market to varying degrees, there has been a cooling, slowing down prices, deserted trading, speculation and speculation behavior has been checked. However, in the face of a strong wait-and-see attitude in the market and the quiet housing market, some local leaders could not stand it. Because the reduction of the amount of market transactions, it means that the reduction of local tax revenue, a direct impact on performance; in view of the real estate development, construction and consumption rely on the bank too deep, the financial strength of the developer if unable to return the funds in time, To stay, bad loans, increase financial risks, but also increase the government voted concerns. Ever since, on the one hand, some local governments have responded positively to the Central Government’s control policies. On the other hand, they have also watched the Central Government and looked around. They have also been waiting for the opportunity to issue detailed explanations. For example, in some places, the central government is to stabilize housing prices rather than to suppress housing prices