论文部分内容阅读
目的对异位妊娠的保守治疗进行深入的分析与讨论,从而得出其在治疗异位妊娠的必要性与可行性。方法由于异位妊娠保守治疗通常分为两类,一类是手术治疗,一类是药物治疗。为了得出异位妊娠的保守治疗的可行性与必要性,作者对天津市东丽区东丽医院2014年6月-2016年6月收治的120例异位妊娠的女性患者的两类相关临床数据进行统计与对比,从而得出更加客观可靠的结论。结果两类保守治疗都对女性以后的生育功能都能起到几乎相似的保护作用,而手术类型的保守治疗相比于药物型的治疗,其术后宫内妊娠率要大于药物保守治疗。结论两者在异位妊娠治疗上,都有很高的成功率,在可行性方面是毋庸置疑的,而在一些年轻的女患者中保守治疗对于她们来说是可以很大程度上避免治疗对子宫造成的不可逆性的损伤,规避不孕不育的风险,以免对患者造成不必要的负担。
Objective To analyze and discuss the conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in order to conclude its necessity and feasibility in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods Because conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy is usually divided into two categories, one is surgical treatment, one is drug treatment. In order to draw the conclusion that the conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy is feasible and necessary, the author of the two types of clinical trials of 120 cases of ectopic pregnancy in female patients Toray Hospital Dongli District in Tianjin from June 2014 to June 2016 Statistics and comparison of data, so as to draw more objective and reliable conclusions. Results Both types of conservative treatment had almost similar protective effect on the reproductive function of women afterwards. However, conservative treatment of surgical type compared with drug-based treatment, the intrauterine pregnancy rate after surgery was greater than that of conservative treatment. Conclusions Both have a high success rate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy and are beyond any doubt as to their feasibility, whereas conservative treatment in some young female patients largely avoids treatment for them Irreversible damage caused by the uterus, to avoid the risk of infertility, so as not to cause unnecessary burden on patients.