中国互联网反垄断审判的里程碑解析最高院裁决“360”诉腾讯滥用市场支配地位纠纷案热点问题

• 作 者: 王春晖
• 机 构: 南京邮电大学信息产业发展战略研究院,中国行为法学会基础理论研究会,北京大学企业与公司法研究中心,
• 出 处: 通信管理与技术
• 发表日期: 2014年05期
• 关键词: 中国 互联网 反垄断 一审判决 解析 高院 裁决 腾讯 滥用市场支配地位 纠纷 最高法院 维持原判 适用法律 审判机关 历史进程 裁判结果 宣判 上诉 标志

2014年10月16日,发生了一件可以作为中国互联网反垄断历史进程标志的大事:中国最高审判机关就“360”诉腾讯滥用市场支配地位纠纷案进行了二审宣判。最高法院认为,一审判决认定事实虽有不当之处,但适用法律正确,裁判结果适当,故驳回上诉,维持原判。我以为,本案的最大意义不在于案件本身,而在于在移动互

On October 16, 2014, a major event that could serve as a symbol of the anti-monopoly history of the Internet in China occurred: China’s supreme judicial authority held the second instance verdict on the “360” v. Tencent’s abuse of market dominance dispute. The Supreme Court held that although the court of first instance held that the facts were improper, the applicable law was correct and the result of the adjudication was appropriate. Therefore, the appeal was rejected and the original verdict was upheld. I think the ultimate significance of this case lies not in the case itself, but in moving each other