论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》(以下简称《法律适用法》)第10条将仲裁机构与法院并列作为外国法查明的主体,并规定不能查明外国法时适用中国法的规定,于法院而言尚具合理性,然而于国际商事仲裁而言则不甚合理。从该法条出发,考察法院以及仲裁庭的实践,国际商事仲裁中在处理准据法查明问题时,不能照搬法院的模式,应当注重仲裁作为纠纷解决方式的特殊性,在尊重当事人意思自治,保障当事人双方合理发表法律意见的前提下,处理准据法查明中的一系列问题。
Article 10 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Law Applicable to Foreign-related Civil Relations (hereinafter referred to as “Law Applicable Law”) shall be the subject of the arbitration institution and the court of law as the subject of foreign law clarification and stipulate that the applicable Chinese laws , Which is reasonable for the court, but less reasonable in the case of international commercial arbitration. From the point of view of this law, the author examines the practice of courts and arbitration tribunals. When handling the applicable law, the international commercial arbitration can not copy the court model and should pay attention to the particularity of arbitration as the means of dispute resolution. , To protect the parties on the premise of a reasonable legal opinion, to handle a number of issues identified in the applicable law.