论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析比较药师干预临床合理用药的应用效果。方法:随机选取我院药师干预实施前后收治的患者各49例,分别设为对照组与观察组,观察药师干预在临床合理用药中的应用效果。结果:对照组患者住院时间为(16.8±1.6)d,住院费用为(4894.06±200.31)元,抗菌药费用为(923.45±23.45)元,未使用抗菌药者1例(20.4%),处方不合格9例(18.4%);观察组患者住院时间为(11.3±1.2)d,住院费用为(3156.08±106.6)元,抗菌药费用为(529.09±14.43)元,未使用抗菌药者5例(10.2%),处方不合格5例(10.2%)。两组对比差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:药师干预可有效缩短患者住院时间,降低住院费用,减少抗菌药物应用量,值得临床推广与应用。
Objective: To analyze and compare the effect of pharmacist intervention clinical application. Methods: A total of 49 patients who were treated before and after the implementation of pharmacist intervention in our hospital were randomly selected as the control group and the observation group, and the effect of pharmacist intervention in clinical rational drug use was observed. Results: The length of stay in the control group was (16.8 ± 1.6) days, the cost of hospitalization was (4894.06 ± 200.31) yuan, the cost of antibacterial drug was (923.45 ± 23.45) yuan, and 1 case (20.4%) did not use antibacterial drug. (11.3 ± 1.2) days, hospitalization cost was (3156.08 ± 106.6) yuan, antimicrobial drug cost was (529.09 ± 14.43) yuan, and no antibacterial drug was used in 5 cases (18.4% 10.2%), 5 cases (10.2%) failed the prescription. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The pharmacist intervention can shorten the hospitalization time, reduce the cost of hospitalization, reduce the application of antibacterial drugs, and worthy of clinical promotion and application.