论文部分内容阅读
不应认定为侵害名誉权的几种情况 一、正当的评论。 为了社会公共利益,对可以受到公众评价的事情进行正当的评论,而涉及到对特定人言行的批评的,不构成侵害名誉权。这是基于国家利益、社会公共利益高于个人利益的原则。也就是说,在发扬民主的过程中,为社会公共利益所进行的正当评论,可以涉及对特定人言行的批评或评论,例如舆论工具对违法犯罪及违反社会公德的行为进行鞭挞;对著作、创作、演讲、表演进行评论;在选举中选民对被选举人发表的意见;公众对领导人的评价;公民控告、检举他人的违法乱纪行为;等等。当然,这种评论必须是为了社会公共利益而发表的意见。至于意见是否正确,不
Should not be identified as infringement of several rights infringement First, the legitimate comments. In the interest of society and public interests, we can make proper comments on things that can be evaluated by the public. However, criticisms concerning specific words and actions do not constitute infringement of reputation. This is based on the principle of national interest, social and public interests above personal interests. In other words, in carrying forward the democratic process, the proper commentary for the public interest in society can involve criticizing or commenting on specific words and deeds. For example, public opinion tools can discredit crimes and violate social morals; for writings, Comments made on the composition, speech, performance of the elector at the election; comments made by the elect on the elector at the election; public assessment of the leader; citizen's accusation and prosecution of other people's violations of laws and disciplines; Of course, this comment must be published for the public interest in the community. As to whether the opinion is correct, no