论文部分内容阅读
宪法法院成立之后,韩国宪法审查制度才真正获取了生命力。这一方面归功于韩国宪政建设环境的改善,另一方面则应归功于宪法法院积极主动履行职责。变形判决制度即是韩国宪法法院汲取德国经验而作的创造性变革。变形判决是相对于原形判决而言的概念。韩国《宪法法院法》规定的“违宪”或“合宪”的判决形式可称之为原形判决;宪法法院在宪法审判实践中逐渐形成的“宪法不合致”判决、“限定合宪”和“限定违宪”判决可称为变形判决。变形判决是针对复杂多样的宪法审判对象而发展出来判决形式,适应了宪法审判的实效需求,展示了一条法律问题技术化的路径。
After the constitutional court was established, Korea’s constitutional review system really gained vitality. This is attributed in part to the improvement of the constitutional environment in South Korea’s constitutional development. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court should give due consideration to its own initiative. The Deformation Judgment System is a creative change made by the Korean Constitutional Court in drawing on German experience. Deformation judgment is relative to the concept of prototype decision. The Constitutional Court Law of Korea stipulates that the verdict of “unconstitutionality” or “constitutional” may be called the prototype decision; the constitutional court gradually formed “constitutional discord” in the practice of the constitutional trial, “Qualified constitution” and “limited unconstitutional” verdict can be called deformation judgments. Deformation judgment is a form of judgment developed for complex and diverse subjects of the constitutional trial and meets the actual needs of the constitutional trial, demonstrating a technical approach to legal issues.