论文部分内容阅读
口述史在20世纪成为越来越被器重的史料搜集途径。相应地,建筑学中也兴起访谈建筑师的热潮。一次采访可能始于各种缘由:史学家会认为,赶在建筑师在世之年做访谈,一方面是挖掘甚至抢救史料,另一方面有助逼近建筑师设计思维中的“黑箱”;主持人或记者则更看重此类访谈的新闻价值与时效性;学生去访谈他们的从业老师,更多是渴望聆听教诲。不管采访者的身份何为、目的何为,一场高质量的访谈都离不开精心的提问设置,而事后编录也尤为重要。这本首
Oral history became more and more important historical data collection method in the 20th century. Accordingly, the upsurge of interviews with architects also arises in architecture. An interview may start with a variety of reasons: historians will think that it is time to do an interview with an architect during his lifetime, on the one hand to dig or even to rescue historical materials and on the other hand to help close the “black box” in the architect’s design thinking; The host or reporter is more concerned about the news value of such interviews and timeliness; students to interview their teachers, more eager to listen to teachings. Regardless of the identity of the interviewer, what is the purpose, a high-quality interviews are inseparable from the careful questioning settings, and postings are particularly important. This first