论文部分内容阅读
俄罗斯学者围绕“马克思的遗产和当代经济学”这一主题展开的争论,实际上是关于马克思主义和自由主义的一场大辩论。其直接起因是激进自由主义经济学家盖达尔和马乌发表文章,对马克思主义进行歪曲和攻击,把马克思主义分为科学理论和“世俗宗教”两个层面,企图对马克思主义进行肢解并取其一部分为自由主义辩护,提出所谓“自由主义马克思主义”。他们的观点遭到俄国马克思主义学者和其他学者的驳斥和批评。在辩论中,大多数学者认为马克思的理论遗产今天仍有重要现实意义,马克思理论是人类思想的伟大成果,巨大的精神财富,即使在今天发生了重大变化的时代,也不可能忽视它,俄国不需要“自由主义马克思主义”。
The controversy over the theme “Marx’s legacy and contemporary economics” by Russian scholars is actually a big debate about Marxism and liberalism. The direct cause is that the radical liberal economists Heydar and Mawu published articles that distorted and attacked Marxism and divided Marxism into scientific theories and secular religions in an attempt to dismember and take Marxism Part of the liberal defense, the so-called “liberal Marxism.” Their views were refuted and criticized by Russian Marxist scholars and other scholars. In the debate, most scholars think that Marx’s theoretical heritage still has important practical significance today. Marxism theory is a great achievement of human thought. Even if great spiritual wealth is available today, it can not be ignored in the era when major changes have taken place. Russia, No need for “liberal Marxism.”