论文部分内容阅读
目的:评估医务人员在新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期间的焦虑、抑郁心理状态，为及早实施针对性心理干预提供理论依据。方法:于2020年2月18至20日，采用《焦虑自评量表》（SAS）、《抑郁自评量表》（SDS），对疫情流行期间天津市及外省市在岗的183名医务人员进行心理状态的评估。按照工作岗位分为一线和非一线医务人员组，按照工作地点分为天津市（本埠）及天津以外城市（外埠）医务人员组，医务人员通过手机终端完成“问卷星”调查问卷,分析不同组别医务人员抑郁和焦虑状态。结果:183名医务人员SAS标准分为（48.96±9.21）分，SDS标准分为（56.69±7.57）分，均高于全国常模[SAS标准分（33.80±5.90）分,SDS标准分（41.88±10.57）分]（n P0.05），但均高于全国常模（n P0.05），但均高于全国常模（n P0.05）。n 结论:医务人员在新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期间表现明显的焦虑和抑郁，应给予心理干预。“,”Objective:To evaluate the degree of anxiety and depression of medical staff during the epidemic period of the COVID-19, and to provide theoretical basis for the pertinence psychological intervention timely.Methods:The investigation about the psychological status of 183 medical staffs on duty during the epidemic period was conducted using Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) from 18th to 20th February, 2020, who came from Tianjin and other provinces. The respondents were divided into first-line and non-first-line groups according to their jobs, and local and non-local groups according to their work places, respectively. The data was collected by “Star Questionnaires” using the mobile terminal, and the statistical analysis was carried out to compare whether there were differences in depression and anxiety among medical staff of different groups.Results:The total SAS score (48.96±9.21) and SDS score (56.69±7.57) of all medical staff were higher than those of the national norm SAS (33.80±5.90) and SDS (41.88±10.57) from 1158 individuals (n P<0.01) . Among 183 medical staff, the anxiety was found in 87 individuals and the rate of anxiety was 47.5%. The depression was found in 134 individuals and its rate was 73.2%. The anxiety combined with depression was found in 69 individuals and its rate was 37.7%. The scores of SAS and SDS of first-line group were (49.40±9.77) and (55.76±6.86) , respectively. And those of non-first-line group were (48.69±8.87) and (57.29±7.96) . They were higher than those of the national norm, and the differences were both statistically significant (n P<0.01) , but there was no difference between the first-line group and non-first-line group. The scores of SAS and SDS of local group were (48.23±9.04) and (56.76±7.05) , while those of non-local group were (50.63±9.45) and (56.54±8.71) , respectively. The differences were statistically significant (n P0.05) .n Conclusion:The anxiety and depression exist obviously among the medical staff during the epidemic period of the COVID-19, and the psychological intervention should be taken out in time.