论文部分内容阅读
报载,在为阳翰笙同志三十年代的长篇小说《地泉》再版作序时,茅盾同志曾直言不讳地指出作品是不很成功的。不久,新版的《地泉》出版了,茅盾同志那篇提出尖锐批评意见的文章一字未动地印在里边。茅盾读后慨然叹曰:“阳翰笙接受意见的雅量是令人钦佩的。”茅公襟怀磊落,坦率直言;阳翰老气度豁达,虚怀若谷。两位前辈实在是我们的榜样。戏剧评论不如文坛、影坛活跃,这是大家都知道的。造成这种状况的原因很多,其中之一,就是批评
In the newspaper, Comrade Mao Dun pointed out bluntly that his works were not very successful in making a preface to the reprint of the “spring of land” by Yang Hansheng in the 1930s. Soon after, the new version of “Earth Spring” was published, and Comrade Mao Dun’s article, which pointedly criticized sharply, was unmasked. Mao Dun read the generous sigh and said: “Yang Hansheng acceptance of the magnanimous is admirable.” Mao Gong open minded, frank and straightforward; Yang Han old open-minded, open-minded. The two predecessors are really our example. Drama criticism is not as good as the literary arena, the film is active, which we all know. There are many reasons for this situation. One of them is criticism