论文部分内容阅读
根据马克思提到的两种方法论原则,《资本论》开篇商品要么被理解为商品一般,要么被理解为简单商品,抑或被理解为二者的综合。柄谷行人双重视角说的引入能较好地证明开篇商品所具有的双重性质以及两种方法论原则的内在联系。然而,根据任何理论体系所要求的无矛盾性,双重视角本身存在的理论悖论又使人不可能引入双重视角说来讨论开篇商品。为此,需要进一步从思辨与体验的视角看待商品,强调商品这一经济范畴所独有的哲学意蕴及其所表现出的科学品质和人本倾向的综合,从而开启一条新路径去理解《资本论》的开篇问题。
According to the two methodological principles that Marx mentions, the opening article of Capital is either understood as a commodity or as a simple commodity or as a combination of the two. The introduction of a dual perspective of the avenue valley pedestrian can better prove the dual nature of the opening article and the inherent relationship between the two methodological principles. However, according to the paradoxical nature of any theoretical system, the theoretical paradox that exists in dual perspectives makes it impossible to introduce a dual perspective to discuss the open-ended product. Therefore, it is necessary to further look at commodities from the perspectives of speculation and experience, emphasizing the philosophical connotation of the unique economic category of commodities and the combination of their scientific quality and humanistic tendencies, thus opening up a new path to understanding “capital On the ”opening question.