论文部分内容阅读
目的分析气囊助产的临床效果,为临床提供参考。方法选取2012年9月-2014年8月医院收治的产妇80例,随机分为对照组与试验组各40例。对照组采取常规助产,试验组采取气囊助产,观察比较2租产妇各产程时间及分娩方式。结果试验组各产程时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),试验组自然分娩率为85.0%明显高于对照组的65.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对产妇采取气囊助产,能有效缩短产程时间,提高自然分娩率,值得应用推广。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of airbag midwifery and provide reference for clinical practice. Methods Eighty maternal women admitted from September 2012 to August 2014 in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and trial group (n = 40). The control group to take the conventional midwifery, the experimental group to take the balloon midwifery, observation and comparison of 2 maternity labor time and delivery mode. Results Compared with the control group, the time of delivery was less in the experimental group than in the control group (P <0.05). The rate of natural delivery in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (85.0% vs 65.0%, P <0.05) . Conclusions The maternal adoption of balloon midwifery can shorten the time of labor and increase the rate of spontaneous delivery, which deserves to be popularized.