论文部分内容阅读
In this article,two types of anaphora—(i)null subjects and(ii)long-distance reflexivisation— will be briefly compared and contrasted between Chinese and some Germanic,Romance,and Slavic languages,showing how they are different typologically.Following Huang(2000a,2013a),utilising intra-sentential anaphora as a testing ground,I shall re-hypothesise that languages in the world can roughly be divided into two groups:syntactic and pragmatic.Finally,I shall outline an analysis of long-distance reflexivisation in Chinese in terms of my neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora.
In this article, two types of anaphora- (i) null subjects and (ii) long-distance reflexivisation- will be briefly vs. contrasted between Chinese and some Germanic, Romance, and Slavic languages, showing how they are different typologically. Favor Huang (2000a, 2013a), utilizing intra-sentential anaphora as a testing ground, I shall re-hypothesize that languages in the world can roughly be divided into two groups: syntactic and pragmatic. Notally, I shall outline an analysis of long-distance reflexivisation in Chinese in terms of my neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora.