论文部分内容阅读
希拉里.普特南为阐明其外在主义立场而设计的孪生地球思想实验,近几十年来一直是内在主义者和外在主义者争论的焦点。作为外在主义的辩护者,美国哲学家弗雷德.德雷斯基通过信息语义学对孪生地球思想实验进行重构和解读,引发了他和内在主义代表人物福多之间的论战。在这场争论中,双方围绕孪生地球思想实验,不断引入新的材料和理论,就心理内容是内在的还是外在的、以及心理内容对行为是否产生因果作用等一些传统问题展开辩论,从而将这些问题的探讨拓展到更深、更广的层面。
Hillary Putnam's twin earth thought experiment designed to elucidate its externalist stance has been the focus of controversy between introversionists and externalists in recent decades. As a defender of externality, American philosopher Fred Dreschi reconstructed and interpreted the twin earth thought experiment through information semantics, triggering a polemic between him and the inner representative Fidelity. In this debate, the two sides took part in the twin earth thought experiments, constantly introducing new materials and theories, debating some traditional issues such as whether the psychological content is intrinsic or extrinsic, and whether psychological content has a causal effect on the behavior, so that both The discussion of these issues extends to a deeper and broader level.