论文部分内容阅读
《民法通则》第127条规定:“饲养的动物造成他人损害的,动物饲养人或者管理人应当承担民事责任;由于受害人的过错造成损害的,动物饲养人或者管理人不承担民事责任;由于第三人的过错造成损害的,第三人应当承担民事责任。”对此规定的理解,我国法学界认识上仍有着分歧,实践中也有一些难以处理的具体问题亟待探讨。一、动物致人损害赔偿责任的性质早在罗马法中,对动物致人损害赔偿就规定了动物占有人的无过错责任。近现代各国民法对此规定不一。有的规定由动物饲养人或占有人对动物致
Article 127 of the General Principles of Civil Law stipulates that: “If the animal being kept causes damage to others, the animal keeper or administrator shall bear civil liability; the animal keeper or manager shall bear no civil liability for damage caused by the fault of the victim; The third party should bear the civil liability because of the fault of the third party. ”There is still some disagreement on the understanding of this regulation in our understanding of the jurisprudence in our country. In practice, there are some specific problems that are difficult to be dealt with urgently. I. The Nature of Liability for Damage Caused by Animals As early as the Roman law, damages for animal-induced injury prescribe the animal's fault-free liability. Modern civil law in different countries have different provisions. Some regulations cause by the animal keeper or occupier animal