Symbiotic Relationship

来源 :Beijing Review | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:jmyjmhcaihiong_11
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  The world’s two largest economies, China and the United States, mark the 35th anniversary of their diplomatic relations on January 1. In the years since 1979 many questions have been asked about this crucial relationship, most notably what are the obstacles and in what direction is the relationship developing? Selected Chinese scholars and diplomats share their thoughts on these and other questions. Excerpts follow:“Cold war is better than real war, trade war is better than cold war and negotiations are better than trade war.”
  The late Chinese leader Mao Zedong is often quoted as saying relations between countries should not only look good, but also be mutually beneficial. For the complicated Sino-U.S. relationship, the economic and trade bonds between the two is as Mao said. The abundant accomplishments achieved during the 24th China-U.S. Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade held in Beijing in December 2013 are proof that there are more common interests between the two despite differences.
  The common economic and trade interests between China and the United States are evident as they have already become one another’s second largest trading partner. Chinese statistics show that bilateral trade volume reached $484.7 billion in 2012, more than 200 times that of 1979, when the two countries established their official relationship. Though Sino-U.S. trade conflicts always attract attention, the conflicts show that the trade relationship between the two countries has achieved great developments. They also reflect that the existing management system has failed to adapt to further development of the bilateral trade relationship. Thus, negotiations are needed to remove barriers.
  There are common interests between China and the United States, but that doesn’t mean the interests of the two countries are completely in accordance. Chinese President Xi Jinping has said, “The Pacific Ocean is broad enough for the two powers of China and the United States.” The two countries should both have the confidence and capacity to manage their differences and build, maintain and develop a constructive, competitive and negotiable relationship. Whether for these two countries, or the world at large, cold war is better than real war, trade war is better than cold war and negotiations are better than trade war.
  In many cases, differences between the two countries are caused by some political factions in the United States imposing their views on China, but these views are often untenable and the common interests between China and the United States are“The Sino-U.S. relationship is not an issue concerning only the two countries, but it also concerns the whole world.”   After 35 years of development, SinoU.S. relations have reached an unprecedented high. Even U.S. politicians Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the major promoters of the establishment of Sino-U.S. diplomatic relations, feel positive about the current close relationship between the two countries.
  The highly interdependent economic and trade relationship is the most characteristic part of the Sino-U.S. relationship. Cultural exchanges have also helped enhance mutual understanding. Chinese people are interested in U.S. culture. For instance, Hollywood movies and U.S. pop music are very popular in China. Also, Chinese culture is gradually finding its way into U.S. society. “Mandarin fever” is emerging in the United States in tandem with the rapid growth of the Chinese economy. In 2010, the U.S. Government decided to send 100,000 students to study in China over the following four years.
  With frequent top-level meetings and consultations on the platform of the ChinaU.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogue, mutual learning has been enhanced and political trust is deepening. But one thing that should be noted is that learning does not mean understanding. What the two sides need to do is deepen understanding on the basis of learning.
  Generally speaking, the Sino-U.S. relationship has undergone a phase of mutual economic interdependence and entered a phase of mutual economic and political interdependence. In the next phase, it should develop into comprehensive mutual interdependence on economy, politics as well as security.
  However, the development of the Sino-U.S. relationship is not linear. Problems and differences still exist between the two countries.
  The trade deficit is one of the most important factors affecting Sino-U.S. relations economically. The United States should avoid politicizing economic issues. To a great extent, the unfavorable balance of trade is caused by the United States itself. On the one hand, many Chinese products exported to the United States are actually produced by U.S. enterprises in China; therefore, the profit also flows back to the United States. On the other hand, Washington imposes high restrictions on hi-tech exports to China, which also contributes to the trade gap. The two countries could cooperate in many fields regarding cutting-edge technology, such as exploring outer space together.
  In recent years, with the rise of China and the relative slowing down of the United States, the two countries once again entered a period of adapting to each other in the Asia-Pacific region. By reading too much into China’s defense policy, the United States can easily make strategic misjudgments, while its rebalancing strategy causes China to naturally become more de- fensive. This problem needs to be resolved as China and the United States seek to develop a new type of relations between major powers.   If we say the stability of the Asia-Pacific region lies in a stable Sino-U.S. relationship, addressing regional problems with Sino-U.S. joint efforts will not only benefit the region, but also contribute to mutual trust and a better bilateral relationship.
  Overall, the Sino-U.S. relationship is no longer asymmetric, but mutually dependent. The two sides need mutual understanding to shape and influence each other. Washington needs to change its traditional attitude in acting as a teacher when dealing with China. China needs to learn from the United States while the United States also needs to learn from China. The Sino-U.S. relationship is not an issue concerning only the two countries, but it also concerns the whole world.
  Chen Yonglong,
  former Chinese
  Ambassador to
  Israel and former Minister Counselor at the Chinese
  Embassy in the
  United States
  “To guarantee the right direction for the two countries, a fourth Sino-U.S. joint communique should be put on the agenda.”
  Thirty-five years ago, China and the United States established official relations. Today, for the long-term prosperity of one another, as well as world peace, I think the two powers will continue to march forward together. The Annenberg Estate meeting of Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Barack Obama in June 2013 sent good signals and marked a new development stage for Sino-U.S. relations as the two countries reached consensus on building a new type of relationship between major countries.
  Building this new type of relationship is a century-long project. There are many areas for the two countries to work on together, transforming consensus to policy and then to action.
  To guarantee the right direction for the two countries, a fourth Sino-U.S. joint communique should be put on the agenda. The new joint communique should focus on the purpose, principle and objectives of building this new type of relationship, which could become the roadmap for development of the Sino-U.S. relationship in a new era.
  Both countries need to expand mutual trust to lay a strategic foundation for this new type of relationship. Many observers have played up mutual distrust between Beijing and Washington given their vastly different social systems and values, which some claim may become factors that could lead to war. We need to admit the differences between the two countries objectively, and we also need to change the confrontational mindset to match modern security concepts, as well as ideas of common interests. Building a cooperative partnership benefits both sides.
  A sound bilateral economic and trade relationship serves as a good basis for a strong Sino-U.S. relationship. Strengthening cooperation on trade and investment should be a long-term process and needs joint efforts. No matter how many differences there are between them, economic mutual dependence between the two is the reality. The role of economic cooperation in the overall Sino-U.S. relationship will continually increase.
  We also feel positive that military exchanges between China and the United States are becoming more active. Mutual visits by military leaders become more frequent. These are conducive to a new type of military relationship. Still, to promote the balanced development of the overall Sino-U. S. relationship, China and the United States should upgrade strategic dialogue regarding security and further enhance pragmatic cooperation and exchanges between the two militaries.
其他文献
近日,一场名为BRLOOTE 2016 S/ S Fashion Show的时尚走秀在绍兴咸亨酒店举行。现场绚烂的灯光、世界顶级名模、设计精致的系列服饰都让专业观众大饱眼福,但你肯定意想不到,这样一场专业的时尚服饰品牌发布秀来自于一家做面料起家的企业。  其实,随着纺织行业的不断创新升级,不少面料企业纷纷开始注册服装品牌,准备大干一场,这样的企业在柯桥更是不在少数。早在20年前,“以服装为龙头发展
随着全业务的全面开展和数据业务的快速增长,“互联网+”时代的到来,移动通信企业面临了更多的挑战。作为企业管理核心的财务部门,需要顺应时代发展的需求,从战略高度及时调整财
教师是教学活动的主导,推动教育教学发展必须应时进行教学改革,当今社会发展依仗劳动者的创新与创造,传统的教学模式已经不能满足学生和社会的需求,需要在教师、学校等多个层
期刊
建筑行业快速发展,在结构造型快速更新的背景下,逐渐有更多新型技术和材料被应用其中,不仅可以提高基础功能的丰富性,同时还可以达到节能降耗的效果.为追求外观效果,现在对建
期刊
数字化技术的出现和发展,给各行各业的工作都带来了一定的改变,对医院来说,数字化技术对档案管理工作的影响尤为突出.在过去,医院的档案管理应用的是传统的手段,相比之下,数
中国特别是浙江省城乡社会养老保障体系发展的重点,已经开始由城乡统筹迈向城乡一体化发展的新阶段,农民流动也已呈现出多元化的新特点.社会养老保障作为影响劳动力资源市场
随着我国以工业化和城市化为重要标志的现代化发展进程的加快,农民失地必将成为一种社会常态.因此,全方位、分类型、多视角地调研这一社会现象中已经存在和可能出现的矛盾与