论文部分内容阅读
农村信用社社员权包括社员表决权、选举权与被选举权等诸多子权利,并由这些子权利而形成为一种“整合构造”。然而,农村信用社社员权与其自主行使之间却存在着难以理顺的法律悖论。为此,与这种权利“整合化”理论相逆向的权利分离现象便应运而生。它以意思自治为前提,具有社员权行使的适法性;它以倾斜保护为手段,能够有效提升社员参与的法律地位;它以专业服务为归宿,可以破解社员权行使之障碍。因此,为使社员权能够真正成为保护农民合法权益的有效手段,未来农村信用社社员权的整合构造必须配以相应的社员权代理行使制度与代表行使制度,并在该权利遭受损害时,通过私力与公力等二元救济而得以解决。这些措施能有效解决农村信用社社员权整合构造的悖论,并可最大限度地克服因社员权的自主行使而产生的困境。
Membership rights of rural credit cooperatives include members’ right to vote, the right to vote and the right to be elected, and these rights form an integrated structure. However, there is an unmanageable legal paradox between RCC members’ rights and their self-determination. For this reason, the separation of rights from the “integration” theory of such rights arises at the historic moment. It takes the autonomy of the will as the precondition and has the legitimacy of exercising the members ’rights. It uses the oblique protection as a means to effectively improve the legal status of the participation of the members. It takes the professional service as the destination and can solve the obstacles of exercising the members’ rights. Therefore, in order to make the members ’rights truly become effective means to protect the legitimate rights and interests of peasants, the integration structure of rural credit cooperatives’ rights should be accompanied by the corresponding exercise system and representative exercise system for the rights of rural credit cooperatives in the future. When the rights are damaged, Private and public funds and other binary relief can be resolved. These measures can effectively solve the paradox of the integration of rural credit cooperatives, and can overcome the predicament arising from the independent exercise of the members’ rights to the maximum extent.