论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究心肺复苏方式的临床对比效果。方法:选取我院2015年4月至2016年10月共82例患者,分为对照组和观察组,各组41例。对照组:对患者进行人工组复苏方法;观察组:对患者进行机控复苏方法。结果:两组患者的氧分压、血氧饱和度、二氧化碳分压相比较,差异较小,无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组的收缩压和按压有效率要低于观察组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:机控复苏方法的方法能有效的改善患者脑缺氧的情况,提高成功机率和成活率,保证了抢救过程的连贯,能满足临床需求,值得推广。
Objective: To study the clinical effect of CPR. Methods: A total of 82 patients in our hospital from April 2015 to October 2016 were divided into control group and observation group, 41 cases in each group. Control group: patients with artificial group recovery method; observation group: patients with controlled recovery method. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in oxygen partial pressure, oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide partial pressure (P> 0.05). The systolic pressure and compression effective rate in the control group were lower than those in the observation group, The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The method of machine controlled resuscitation can effectively improve the cerebral hypoxia in patients, improve the chances of success and survival, ensure the coherence of the rescue process, meet the clinical needs and be worthy of popularization.