论文部分内容阅读
这个关于中国北方某村庄竞争性选举的研究指出了两类矛盾:一类是村民与村干部的矛盾,另一类是村庄精英与寻求权力者的矛盾。村民与老村官的矛盾集中体现在:后者的腐败与管理不善,导致了集体财产被严重侵蚀和再分配的不公。而村民与新村官的矛盾则在于:后者无法解决老村官遗留下来的问题。这对矛盾不仅引发了民怨,同时也燃起了民众参与政治的热情。精英分子之间的矛盾集中在对政治职务的竞争,由此导致了选举中以及之后政治派别和派系的形成,这已成为乡村政治一个显著的特征。对该村治理问题的调查表明:自由选举导致政治权力激进的再分配,因满足不了村民对集体财产重新公平分配的深层愿望,而无法令村民满意。
This study of competitive elections in a village in north China pointed out two types of contradictions: one is the contradiction between villagers and village cadres, and the other is the contradiction between village elites and those who seek power. The conflicts between the villagers and the village officials are mainly reflected in the fact that the latter’s corruption and mismanagement led to the injustice of the collective property being severely eroded and redistributed. The contradiction between the villagers and the village officials lies in the latter’s inability to solve the problems left by the village officials. This contradiction has not only caused people’s grievance but also raised the public’s enthusiasm for participating in politics. The contradiction between the elites has focused on the competition for political positions, which has led to the formation of political parties and factions during and after the election. This has become a distinctive feature of rural politics. A survey of the governance of the village shows that free elections lead to a radical redistribution of political power that can not satisfy the villagers because they can not satisfy the villagers’ deep desire to reallocate collective property.