论文部分内容阅读
本文分析了法律语言中的一个核心议题:模糊性。法学中,无论是部门法学、法哲学(法理学)、法学方法论或法解释学,都有人把立法语言的模糊性看成是法律不完备或不成熟的一种表现,认为这种立法技术的不完备会影响法治的实现,会影响“相同事项相同对待”的法治原则;而在语言学中,模糊性经常被认为是积极修辞的一种有效手段,两种学科对模糊性的态度迥异。本文主要从三个方面阐述了这种差异的表现以及原因:认定情境不同,所涵盖的内容不同,语言表述方式不同。
This article analyzes one of the core issues in legal language: fuzziness. In law, both the departmental law, legal philosophy (jurisprudence), jurisprudence methodology or legal hermeneutics, some people regard the ambiguity of the legislative language as a manifestation of the law is incomplete or immature, that this legislative technology Incompleteness will affect the realization of the rule of law and will affect the principle of the rule of law in the same treatment of the same issues. In linguistics, ambiguity is often considered as an effective means of active rhetoric. The two disciplines’ ambiguity attitude Different. This article mainly expounds the manifestations of the differences and the reasons from three aspects: the different situations, the different contents and the different ways of language expression.