论文部分内容阅读
对于仲裁协议效力异议的决定机构,当前的国际通例是以法院和仲裁庭“并存控制”的方式决定协议的效力,否定仲裁庭为唯一的决定机构的做法;而我国的决定机构则是以法院和仲裁机构并存的形式,本文以“自裁管辖学说”为法理依据结合分析各主体的优势,对我国现存仲裁协议效力异议的决定主体方面认为应肯定法院的优势地位,在确定仲裁庭的异议管辖权的同时赋予仲裁委员会对异议的初步决定权。
As for the decision-making organ that disagrees with the validity of the arbitration agreement, the current international convention decides the validity of the agreement by the court and arbitration tribunal “coexist control ”, and negates the practice of the arbitration tribunal as the sole deciding organ; while the decider of our country is In the form of the coexistence of courts and arbitration institutions, this paper, based on the jurisprudence of “self-governing jurisprudence ”, combined with the analysis of the superiority of each subject and the main determinants of the validity of the existing arbitration agreement in our country, we should affirm the dominant position of the court, Tribunal objection jurisdiction at the same time give the Arbitration Commission the right to decide the initial decision.