论文部分内容阅读
最低转售价格维持(RPM)是一类广泛使用的商业行为,它具有促进竞争和反竞争的效果。对于这类行为应采用合理原则的分析方式判断其合法性。我国最高法院的司法解释和上海一中院在强生案中判决对转售价格维持均采用合理原则的分析方式。在这一原则之下可以发展出更加专注的结构型合理原则,以此可以提高规则的可操作性和法律确定性。
Minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) is a widely used type of business activity that promotes competition and anti-competitive effects. For such acts should be based on a reasonable principle of analysis to determine its legitimacy. Judicial interpretation of China’s Supreme Court and the Shanghai Intermediate People’s Court ruled in Johnson & Johnson that the resale price should be maintained in a fair and reasonable manner. Under this principle, a more focused and reasonable principle of structure can be developed, so as to improve the operability and legal certainty of the rules.