论文部分内容阅读
正确评价恩格斯对《剩余价值理论》的理解,无论对《资本论》创作史的研究,还是对恩格斯晚年经济思想的研究,都有着重要的意义。李善明同志在《恩格斯并不完全了解<剩余价值理论>手稿》(以下简称“李文”)中提出:“恩格斯并不十分清楚《剩余价值理论》的整个写作过程,也未能有机会和时间全面地对它进行系统的探索和考察”;并断言恩格斯在“涉及到这部著作时,所说过的一些话,也未必就完全中肯确切。”尽管李善明同志近年对《剩余价值理论》作过深入研究,提出过许多有意义的见解,但该文提出的观点却未必中肯、确切。在这里,我仅就其中三个问题提出一些不同看法。
Correctly evaluating Engels' understanding of “surplus value theory” is of great significance both in the study of the creation history of “capitalism” and in the study of Engels's economic thinking in his later years. Comrade Li Shan-ming put forward in Engels's article “The Manuscript of Surplus Value Theory” (“Li Wen”): “Engels did not fully understand the whole writing process of” surplus value theory “nor did he Have the opportunity and time to systematically explore and examine it ”, and assert that Engels may not be entirely pertinent when he“ refers to this work. ”“ Although Comrade Li Shan-ming In recent years, ”surplus value theory" made in-depth study, put forward many meaningful opinions, but the views of the article is not necessarily pertinent, exact. Here, I only make some different opinions on three of these issues.