论文部分内容阅读
戴震自评《孟子字义疏证》为其生平“第一书”，可是两百年来此书恰恰不断引起争论，其中的关键在于如何评价其解释目的、方法与效果。探究戴震《孟子》解释方法论，不仅有益于拓展中国古典解释学的研究领域，而且有助于推进对戴震哲学思想乃至清代学术思潮的深入讨论。基于这一认识，本文致力于从严格的材料出发研究戴震《孟子》解释方法论，揭示其挑战性的解释目的，分析其创造性的解释体例，总结其纠偏性的解释方法，从整体上显现出戴震解释方法论的理论模式、实践特征及其重要的学术思想价值。
Dai Zhen self-assessment, “Mencius meaningless Shuzheng” for the first book of his life, but two hundred years of this book just continue to cause controversy, the key lies in how to evaluate the purpose of interpretation, methods and effects. Studying Dai Zhen’s “Mencius” interpretation methodology not only helps to expand the research field of classical Chinese hermeneutics, but also helps to deepen the discussion on Dai Zhen’s philosophy and even the academic trend of Qing Dynasty. Based on this understanding, this dissertation is devoted to studying Dai Zhen’s “Mencius” interpretation methodology from the strict material, revealing its challenging explanation purpose, analyzing its creative explanations, summarizing its correctiveness interpretation method, and displaying Dai Zhen as a whole Interpretation of the theoretical model of methodology, practical characteristics and its important value of academic thought.