论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨使用包皮环切吻合器与常规包皮环切术两种手术方法的临床应用效果。方法随机将220例包茎、包皮过长患者分成环切吻合器(A组,112例)与包皮环切(B组,108例)两组,比较其优缺点及疗效。结果 A组比B组的手术时间短、出血少、术后不需拆线、术后感染率低、术后创缘整齐,外型美观。结论应用一次性包皮环切吻合器行包皮环切术,手术简单,并发症少,患者痛苦小,易推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of two circumcision surgical approaches including circumcision stapler and circumcision. Methods 220 cases of phimosis and prepuce were randomly divided into two groups: circumcision stapler (group A, 112 cases) and circumcision (group B, 108 cases), and their advantages and disadvantages were compared. Results Group A had shorter operation time, less bleeding and no need to suture removal after operation. The postoperative infection rate was lower and wound margin was neat and the appearance was good. Conclusion Circumcision using a one-time circumcision circumcision, the operation is simple, fewer complications, patients with less pain, easy to promote.