论文部分内容阅读
我时常想起一节公开课中所听到的几个提问。该教师授课的中心是:多种感官并用感受自然。问题一:“描写中调动了____?”(师投影“春风图”文字片段)“生活积累、修辞技巧、多种感官……”似乎都可在思考范围内,故学生的解答未能高效接近“预设”。问题二:“有没有值得我们学习的地方?”(师出示一练笔片段)“选材(新颖、富生活气息)、表达(生动、有趣、精练、富画面感)……”也都完全符合题意,所以学生的解答“跑题”也就在情理之中了。
I often think of a few questions I heard in a public lesson. The teacher taught the center is: a variety of senses and feel the natural. Question 1: “The description of the mobilization of ____?” “(Teacher projection ” Spring Festival “text fragment) ” Life accumulation, rhetorical skills, a variety of senses ...... “seems to be within the scope of thinking, Student's solution failed to efficiently approach ”preset“. Question 2: ”There is no place for us to learn? “ (Teacher shows a practice pen fragment) ”Material selection (novel, full of life breath), expression (vivid, interesting, refined, rich picture) Are fully in line with the inscription, so the student's answer “running problem ” is also reasonable.