论文部分内容阅读
目的本研究旨在探索不同情绪状态对不同人格大学生风险决策的影响。方法本研究结合问卷法和实验法,研究不同人格的18~25岁在校大学生,在积极和消极两种情绪状态下风险决策的差异。采用大五人格量表简化版对大学生人格进行测量、分组。根据其中开放性维度得分的高低分出高分组和低分组,再随机各分成两组。各组实验参与者经过积极情绪或消极情绪的诱导后执行风险决策,并对自己决策过程中的情绪状态进行评价。结果通过相关分析得出,冒险得分和风险倾向性得分显著相关(r=0.861)。人格的主效应边缘显著(F=3.306,P=0.074,ηp2=0.056),情绪的主效应显著(F=5.587,P=0.022,ηp2=0.091),人格与情绪的交互作用显著(F=6.479,P=0.014,ηp2=0.104)。结论不同开放性人格大学生在风险决策中的冒险性差异存在边缘显著,在风险倾向性上不存在显著差异;积极情绪和消极情绪对于风险决策的冒险性和风险倾向性影响显著,积极情绪状态下倾向于风险偏好,消极情绪状态下倾向于风险规避;情绪和人格对于风险决策的冒险得分和风险偏好得分有交互作用。
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of different emotional states on the risk decision-making of different personality college students. Methods This study combines the questionnaire method and the experimental method to study the differences of risk decision-making between positive and negative emotional states of college students aged 18 to 25 with different personality. Adopting a simplified version of the Big Five personality scale to measure and classify college students’ personality. According to the level of openness in which scores were divided into high and low score group, and then randomly divided into two groups. The experimental participants in each group after the induction of positive or negative emotions to implement risk decision-making, and to evaluate the emotional state of their own decision-making process. The results obtained by correlation analysis showed that risk scores and risk predisposition scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.861). The main effect of personality was marginal (F = 3.306, P = 0.074, ηp2 = 0.056). The main effect of emotion was significant (F = 5.587, P = 0.022, ηp2 = 0.091) and the interaction between personality and emotion was significant , P = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.104). Conclusion There are significant differences in the risk-taking differences between different open personality college students in risk decision-making and there is no significant difference in the risk propensity. Positive emotion and negative emotion have significant influence on the risk-taking and risk predisposition of risk decision-making. In the positive emotion state Tend to risk preference, tend to risk aversion in the state of negative emotion; emotion and personality interact risk-taking score and risk preference score of risk decision-making.